ID. Article Makes N.Y. Times
02/07/2005 Michael Behe got a full-length column in the New
York Times (reproduced at Discovery.com)
to present the case for intelligent design. The EvolutionNews blog says it is the
second most emailed article from that day’s edition, and asks, “Who says
there’s no controversy?”
Which side wants to air the
debate? Which side wants to shut off debate? What does that
tell you? Sample line from Behe’s op-ed: “Still, some
critics claim that science by definition can’t accept design, while
others argue that science should keep looking for another explanation in
case one is out there. But we can’t settle questions about reality
with definitions, nor does it seem useful to search relentlessly for a
non-design explanation of Mount Rushmore....”
[2005/02/07] ID. Article Makes N.Y. Times
